Difficulty: What the hell
Today’s post is simple: a few symbolic-logic proof exercises. No quantifiers. No modal logic. Just derive the indicated conclusions from the premises supplied. These are not one-step gimmies, so slow down and actually work through them.
I’ll likely post solutions tomorrow.
Exercise 1
1. P → Q
2. Q → R
3. P ∨ S
4. ¬R
∴ S
Exercise 2
1. P → (Q ∧ R)
2. ¬R ∨ S
3. P
∴ S
Exercise 3
1. P → Q
2. R → S
3. ¬Q
4. P ∨ R
∴ S
Exercise 4
1. (P ∨ Q) → R
2. ¬R
∴ ¬P ∧ ¬Q
Exercise 5
1. P → Q
2. Q → (R ∨ S)
3. ¬R
4. P
∴ S
Exercise 6
1. P ↔ Q
2. Q → R
3. ¬R
∴ ¬P
Exercise 7
1. (P ∧ Q) → R
2. P
3. ¬R
∴ ¬Q
Exercise 8
1. P → Q
2. Q → R
3. R → S
4. ¬S
∴ ¬P
If these still feel too easy, good. Basic logical competence should eventually feel boringly obvious. That’s the point.