Baby Logic Practice: Derive the Conclusions

Difficulty: What the hell

Today’s post is simple: a few symbolic-logic proof exercises. No quantifiers. No modal logic. Just derive the indicated conclusions from the premises supplied. These are not one-step gimmies, so slow down and actually work through them.

I’ll likely post solutions tomorrow.

Exercise 1

1. P → Q

2. Q → R

3. P ∨ S

4. ¬R

∴ S

Exercise 2

1. P → (Q ∧ R)

2. ¬R ∨ S

3. P

∴ S

Exercise 3

1. P → Q

2. R → S

3. ¬Q

4. P ∨ R

∴ S

Exercise 4

1. (P ∨ Q) → R

2. ¬R

∴ ¬P ∧ ¬Q

Exercise 5

1. P → Q

2. Q → (R ∨ S)

3. ¬R

4. P

∴ S

Exercise 6

1. P ↔ Q

2. Q → R

3. ¬R

∴ ¬P

Exercise 7

1. (P ∧ Q) → R

2. P

3. ¬R

∴ ¬Q

Exercise 8

1. P → Q

2. Q → R

3. R → S

4. ¬S

∴ ¬P

If these still feel too easy, good. Basic logical competence should eventually feel boringly obvious. That’s the point.

Unknown's avatar

Author: Raymond Chuang

Meng-Ju (Raymond) Chuang is a fully caffeinated Vanderbilt University summa cum laude graduate with a B.A. in psychology and philosophy (hon’s) and an M.M. in jazz piano from Fu Jen Catholic University. When he's not doing nerdy things, he's doing even nerdier things, like performing jazz piano and playing the theremin.

Leave a comment